THE AWARD
CATEGORIES
REGISTRATION
SUBMIT YOUR WORK
ENTRY INSTRUCTIONS
TERMS & CONDITIONS
PUBLICATIONS
DATES & FEES
METHODOLOGY
CONTACT
WINNERS
PRESS ROOM
GET INVOLVED
DESIGN PRIZE
DESIGN STORE
 
THE AWARD | JURY | CATEGORIES | REGISTRATION | PRESS | WINNERS | PUBLICATIONS | ENTRY INSTRUCTIONS

Submission Optimizer - Indicators

Home > Control Panel > Submission Optimizer > Indicators

This page describes how the numeric score for submission presentation quality is calculated, together with the indications of what the scores mean. To learn more about submission optimization, please click here.

TABLE.1 - SUBMISSION PRESENTATION QUALITY SCORE INDICATORS

Score Range

What does it mean?

Suggested Action

High Presentation Quality
090-100 Highest Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically very correct. You do not need to make any further modifications unless requested by the preliminary jury. Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks.
080-090 Very High Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically correct. Yet still, you might still want to improve the score for the best results. Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks.
070-080 High Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically correct. Yet still, you should still improve the presentation score for better results. Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks.
Average Presentation Quality
060-070 Above Average Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically acceptable. But it is suggested to improve it to get better results. Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks.
050-060 Average Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically acceptable. But it is suggested to improve it to get better results. Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks.
040-050 Below Average Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically acceptable. But it is highly suggested to improve the presentation. Nominate Design if your design passes the preliminary checks.
Low Presentation Quality
030-040 Low Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically incorrect. It is suggested to improve the presentation quality before moving forward. Fix the Warnings and Suggestions as indicated by the Optimizer.
020-030 Very Low Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically incorrect.It is highly suggested to improve the presentation quality significantly before continuing. Fix the Warnings and Suggestions as indicated by the Optimizer.
010-020 Ultra Low Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically incorrect. It is required to improve the presentation quality significantly for this particular submission. Fix the Warnings and Suggestions as indicated by the Optimizer.
000-010 Lowest Presentation Quality: The presentation for this design is technically non-existent. It is required to improve the presentation quality significantly for this particular submission. Complete your submission first by updating visuals and providing description before nomination.

Table 1 explains what the assigned quality scores mean for you, and what your suggested action should be. To get a higher submission presentation quality score, please follow the suggestions and warnings of the optimizer.

TABLE.2 - SUBMISSION PRESENTATION QUALITY SCORE BREAKDOWN
Images - 57 points total
Main Image 30 Points
Optional Images #1 5 Points
Optional Images #2 5 Points
Optional Images #3 5 Points
Optional Images #4 5 Points
Video File 1 Point
PDF Presentation 6 Points
   
Descriptive Text - 33 points
Design Name 2 Points
Function 2 Points
Inspiration 2 Points
Unique Properties / Project Description 3 Points
Operation / Flow / Interaction 2 Points
Project Duration and Location 2 Points
External Link 1 Point
Video Link 1 Point
Public Link 1 Point
Production / Realization Technology 3 Points
Specifications / Dimensions / Package / Technical Properties 3 Points
Tags 3 Points
Research Abstract 3 Points
Challenge 3 Points
Team Members 1 Point
   
Bookpage & PR Summary - 5 points
Bookpage & PR Summary 5 Points
   
Client/Studio/Brand Details - 5 points
Relevancy 1 Point
Name 1 Point
Profile 2 Points
Logo 1 Point

Table 2 explains how the submission presentation quality score is calculated. By editing or fixing these fields you can improve the scores significantly.

 
design award logo

BENEFITS
THE DESIGN PRIZE
WINNERS SERVICES
PR CAMPAIGN
PRESS RELEASE
MEDIA CAMPAIGNS
AWARD TROPHY
AWARD CERTIFICATE
AWARD WINNER LOGO
PRIME DESIGN MARK
BUY & SELL DESIGN
DESIGN BUSINESS NETWORK
AWARD SUPPLEMENT

METHODOLOGY
DESIGN AWARD JURY
PRELIMINARY SCORE
VOTING SYSTEM
EVALUATION CRITERIA
METHODOLOGY
BENEFITS FOR WINNERS
PRIVACY POLICY
ELIGIBILITY
FEEDBACK
WINNERS' MANUAL
PROOF OF CREATION
WINNER KIT CONTENTS
FAIR JUDGING
AWARD YEARBOOK
AWARD GALA NIGHT
AWARD EXHIBITION

MAKING AN ENTRY
ENTRY INSTRUCTIONS
REGISTRATION
ALL CATEGORIES

FEES & DATES
FURTHER FEES POLICY
MAKING A PAYMENT
PAYMENT METHODS
DATES & FEES

TRENDS & REPORTS
DESIGN TRENDS
DESIGNER REPORTS
DESIGNER PROFILES
DESIGN INTERVIEWS

ABOUT
THE AWARD
AWARD IN NUMBERS
HOMEPAGE
AWARD WINNING DESIGNS
DESIGNER OF THE YEAR
MUSEUM OF DESIGN
PRIME CLUBS
SITEMAP
RESOURCE

RANKINGS
DESIGNER RANKINGS
WORLD DESIGN RANKINGS
DESIGN CLASSIFICATIONS
POPULAR DESIGNERS

CORPORATE
GET INVOLVED
SPONSOR AN AWARD
BENEFITS FOR SPONSORS

PRESS
DOWNLOADS
PRESS-KITS
PRESS PORTAL
LIST OF WINNERS
PUBLICATIONS
RANKINGS
CALL FOR ENTRIES
RESULTS ANNOUNCEMENT

CONTACT US
CONTACT US
GET SUPPORT

Follow us : Twitter Twitter | Twitter Facebook | Twitter Google+.
Share |